The Business of Cyber Security

VAR/SI and MSP-to-MSSP

The reseller layer of the channel contains two different businesses under one label: the transactional box-mover (thin, undifferentiated, low-multiple) and the services-attached solution provider (sticky, recurring, a serial PE roll-up asset). Presidio illustrates the latter: in April 2024, CD&R agreed to acquire a majority stake in Presidio from BC Partners — the second consecutive private-equity ownership of the same IT solutions provider (BC Partners took it private in 2019). Underneath the reseller layer, the MSP→MSSP transition is turning thousands of small IT shops into the richest recurring-revenue roll-up ground in the channel.

Reseller → VAR → SI: the services attach

The three labels describe a ladder of value-add, and the rung determines the margin, the stickiness, and the multiple:

Pure reseller VAR (value-added reseller) Solution provider / SI
What they do Take an order, fulfill it Resell + design, deploy, integrate, configure, wrap services A VAR at the top end: embed products in a multi-vendor architecture, heavy professional services, program delivery
Sells to Anyone Mid-market & enterprise Large enterprise & federal
How they make money Resale margin + vendor rebates Product margin + services attach (the real profit) + managed-services recurring Services-led (the product is almost a pass-through) + recurring managed mix
Stickiness None — transactional High — owns the architecture & the relationship Very high — embedded in mission-critical programs
M&A profile Lowest multiple; a margin, not an asset Roll-up target — services attach makes it defensible High-value; enterprise/federal certification moats

In short: a reseller earns a margin; a VAR/SI owns a relationship. A pure reseller of $100M revenue and a services-heavy VAR of $100M revenue are not worth the same multiple — the VAR's services attach, recurring managed mix, and customer ownership are what a buyer actually pays for. The single most important diligence number for a channel target is the services-attach rate and the recurring/managed mix.

The named players

The roll-up logic (why Optiv/KKR and Presidio/CD&R are the templates): PE consolidates security VARs/SIs because services attach + vendor certifications + recurring managed revenue convert a low-margin reseller into a high-margin, defensible platform — then buy-and-build adds geography, vendor lines, and managed offerings while consolidating the back office. Operator economics: Operator Economics.

MSP → MSSP: the channel's recurring roll-up ground

An MSP delivers IT as an ongoing managed service (per-seat/per-device, recurring) to SMB and mid-market. An MSSP does the same for security (24/7 monitoring, MDR, co-managed security tooling — see MSSP, MDR). The defining channel transition of this decade is MSPs moving up into security — and it is happening for three reinforcing reasons:

  1. Demand pull. SMBs cannot hire security staff, but cyber-insurance questionnaires, compliance (CMMC/HIPAA/SOC 2), and customer security reviews now require a managed security posture. The MSP is the trusted IT provider already in the account — so the security attach lands on them.
  2. Margin pull. Commodity managed IT is a low-margin, price-pressured business. Security services carry materially higher margin and stickier contracts — adding an MDR/security tier raises ARPU and gross margin on the same customer base without new customer acquisition. (See the value ladder below.)
  3. Tooling that makes it possible. Platform vendors and RMM/PSA stacks (the operational backbone — RMM/PSA tooling, plus security platforms with multi-tenant managed tiers) let a small MSP deliver enterprise-grade security without building a SOC from scratch — either by partnering with an MDR provider or by reselling a product-platform's managed tier.

The result is a vast, fragmented long tail — tens of thousands of $2–50M MSPs — consolidating into security-managed platforms. That fragmentation plus recurring revenue is why MSP/MSSP roll-ups are among the most active PE theses in the channel: Thrive, Ntiva, Coretelligent, Integris, Evergreen Services Group, and Sandler-/Berkshire-/Court-Square-style platforms are all buying sub-scale MSPs and bolting on security to lift the multiple. The arbitrage: acquire a commodity MSP at a single-digit EBITDA multiple, re-tier its base into security-managed recurring revenue, and exit a scaled MSSP platform at a materially higher multiple (MSSP, Operator Economics).

The channel value ladder — margin & multiple rise with services + recurring mix low mid high margin · stickiness · multiple → Reseller transactional VAR + services attach SI + multi-vendor MSP recurring MSSP security-managed
Value rises with services attach and recurring mix. Transactional resale (grey) is a margin, not an asset; VAR/SI add services; MSP adds recurring; the MSSP tier — security delivered as a managed service — is the richest and most consolidation-attractive rung. (Illustrative; see 36 for the underlying multiple math.)

The bear case

Three things could break the roll-up thesis:

  1. Services don't re-rate on scale alone. A bigger pile of labor-bound, project-heavy services revenue does not automatically command a software-like multiple. The re-rate only comes if the recurring/managed mix genuinely rises — bolt-ons that add headcount but not recurring revenue destroy the thesis. Falsifier: scaled VAR/MSP roll-ups that exit at the same multiple they bought in at.
  2. Talent is the asset and it walks. Services value lives in scarce engineers and trusted account owners. Integration that triggers attrition vaporizes the very thing acquired. Falsifier: post-close revenue declines tracking senior-staff departures.
  3. Platforms and marketplaces disintermediate the middle. As product-platforms ship richer managed tiers (Falcon Complete, Defender Experts, Cortex) and buyers transact through cloud marketplaces (05a), the pure-resale function compresses. The VAR/MSP survives only by owning the relationship and the security outcome, not the transaction. Falsifier: services-attach rates and managed mix eroding as marketplace + platform-managed tiers capture the work.

Why it matters in M&A


Sources: CD&R — to acquire Presidio from BC Partners (Apr 2024); Channelweb — Presidio set for second PE takeover.


Updated 2026-08-16 18:13 UTC · © El Dorado Capital · el-doradocapital.com · Market intelligence for informational purposes only; not investment advice.